Location. The Utkuhikhalik (or simply Utku) Inuit settlement of the Central Canadian Arctic and the Qipisa Inuit of Baffin Island will hereafter be referred to simply as “Inuit.” While that term, on this page, refers to just those two communities, many of the practices and beliefs of those two villages are similar to other Inuit peoples.

Inuit Woman in Homan, NT, Canada Jenney Carley's photo stream on Flickr, Creative Commons License

Inuit Woman in Homan, NT, Canada (formerly on Jenney Carley’s photo stream on flickr with a Creative Commons license)

 Economy. Though they are now integrated into the cash economy, they still try to practice their traditional hunting, trapping, fishing, and trading as much as possible. An article in 2014 discussed how economic issues contribute to Inuit feelings of happiness while another the same year explored the importance of their hunting traditions.

Beliefs that Foster Peacefulness. Contradictory, opposite beliefs are important and constructive for the Inuit: as a hunting people, killing is essential, but nonviolence is an equally essential value in maintaining society. Self-sufficiency is important for a man in order to be a good hunter, but nurturance is critical for him to be a part of the group. The Inuit clearly enjoy killing–their eyes shine with excitement when they tell hunting stories–yet they react with horror, not only to the idea of killing a human but to any form of interpersonal aggression such as shouting. They associate danger with aggression, such as the animal deaths that they witness around them, their own repressed hostilities toward others, and the realization that others might reciprocate similar feelings.

Avoiding and Resolving Conflicts. The Inuit try to prevent conflicts by being modest, cautious, and reticent about their own accomplishments. In order to avoid directly confronting others, they tend to phrase requests as non-threatening jokes. They do not make invitations or promises, and they hesitate to ask questions to avoid forcing others to give direct answers. When conflicts do arise, people often express their feelings with hints. Anger occasionally erupts, but when it does the angry person simply walks away. The community may ostracize people who develop a tendency to anger, though that would be done subtly, with the people doing the ostracizing acting more nurturing and warmer than ever. For more detailed information about this subject, see, in this website, the article “Conflict Management in a Modern Inuit Community” (Briggs, 2000).

Inuit Morality Play, by Jean Briggs Gender Relations. They exhibit very little tension or conflict between the sexes. In the Inuit home there is a strong sense of human warmth and peacefulness—an attentiveness to the unspoken needs of family members. An important feature of Inuit marriages, when they used to live out on the land, was the clearness of the roles of husbands and wives. The men did the very dangerous and difficult hunting, while the women did the lighter physical tasks around the camp such as cooking, child care, and sewing. Both spouses generally credited the other for the essential nature of their contributions—neither could live without the hunting skills of the hunter, and the man was convinced he could not hunt without the warm clothing sewn by his wife.

Raising Children.

  • Infants. Babies are not disciplined; they are constantly fondled and loved. Normally when the child is three years old, the next one is born, and after a period of emotional adjustment, the child accepts a changed role in the family.
  • Benevolent Aggression. The Inuit use a form of “benevolent aggression” to foster positive social relationships. They develop ambivalence in their children toward love and fear by acting aggressively at the same time they are loving them—by overfeeding them, by roughly cleaning them while they nurse, and so on. They believe these approaches strengthen children by making them independent and by inculcating uncertainty and caution in their attitudes toward human relationships.
  • Games. They play games with the child’s feelings by suggesting hostile and aggressive actions to help create their opposite, the positive, loving emotions. Why don’t you keep a choice piece of food all for yourself, one woman suggested to a three-year old, or “Why don’t you kill your baby brother?”
  • Effects. The games create and reinforce an awareness that there is danger in having possessions that others don’t have, and that one must love and protect baby brother. They create a sense of the danger in wanting something that clearly violates social law. The child learns that the strong external social controls enforcing correct behavior are reinforced with internal controls.
  • Internal Controls. The realization that one might actively enjoy hurting a loved one helps the individual to guard against behavior that might injure; and the guilt feelings that come with any such enjoyment further reinforce loving actions. The games remind children that if they don’t conform to social values they are vulnerable to sanctions. The confusion of wanting to be loved and fearing the consequences of ones behavior prompts children to demonstrate their goodness.
  • Schools. Contemporary schools in Nunavut try to bridge the divide between traditional Inuit culture and the needs of the modern world, but they have problems finding qualified teachers and difficulties gaining the support from the students.

Sense of Self. The non-violent traditions of the Inuit may be described by the key words they use to understand themselves and their society.

  • Ihuma, their word for reason, humaneness, and maturity, suggests that people must not be interfered with, and their privacy and right of self-determination not abridged.
  • Naklik for the Inuit is a balancing value for ihuma: it represents a warm concern for the welfare of others—protection from hunger, cold and danger—and a desire to be with the others. People who possess ihuma should feel naklik; someone who doesn’t feel naklik obviously is lacking ihuma.
  • Ilira is the fear of being scolded—it represents a sanction for the other values. The feeling of ilira, an undesirable emotion, prompts the countervailing, desirable feeling of naklik.

Map of Central and Eastern Canadian Arctic InuitSocial Control. Control of anger, or hostile emotion of any kind, is an imperative for the Inuit. Accidents, inept behavior, and failures result only in murmurs or gentle laughter—people impose strong self control on their emotions.

Strategies for Avoiding Warfare and Violence. The confusion of affection and fear that the Inuit build up in their young people appears to be an important method for insuring the peacefulness of their society. They fuse their hostility toward violence with their strong feelings about fear and affection, developed through their process of teaching their children ambivalent feelings toward both emotions. These beliefs, practices, and emotions allow them to divert aggression into non-threatening channels.

But How Much Violence Do They Really Experience? Many Inuit communities experience violence. They tell stories of murders in their past, when they used to live out on the land, and they continue to experience an alarmingly high percentage of suicides, especially among their youth. The violence in their communities is caused by numerous factors including, in part, excessive alcohol consumption. Since they moved into settled communities, many have had a difficult time developing new, and yet still peaceful, cultural patterns. The Inuit are included in this website because their strategies for fostering interpersonal gentleness and squelching anger, as described by Briggs among the Utku and Qipisa people, still appear to be worth careful study. Recent articles may help promote an understanding of contemporary Inuit culture. For instance: alcohol use is alien to Inuit society, and they are highly aware of the violence that it can cause; Inuit women and girls are vulnerable to sexual exploitation and trafficking; and the abandonment of traditional ways of life many years ago has helped cause homicides and suicides.

Scholarly Resources in this Website:

  • “’Why Don’t You Kill Your Baby Brother?’ The Dynamics of Peace in Canadian Inuit Camps” (Briggs, 1994)
  • “Conflict Management in a Modern Inuit Community” (Briggs, 2000)

More Resources in this Website:

  • According to a 2013 study, mental illnesses and childhood sexual and physical assaults are two of the major factors that put the Inuit, especially their youth, at risk of suicides, though a 2014 report placed the blame primarily on the disorientation caused by the people moving off the land several generations ago. Another report in 2010 suggested strategies for halting Inuit suicides.
  • A news story in 2015 described the ways Inuit leaders are helping young men to rebuild traditions of peaceful family life.
  • Cooperation with others is an adaptive mechanism for survival.
  • The discovery of a ship from the lost Franklin Expedition suggested the accuracy of traditional Inuit knowledge and oral history.
  • The importance of preserving and strengthening the Inuit native languages was discussed in reports in 2014, 2012 and 2011.
  • The artists in some Inuit communities have worldwide reputations, as do some of the sculptors.

Sources in Print: Briggs 1970, 1974, 1978, 1982, 1987, 1994, 1998

Sources on the Web: Wikipedia (English Version)Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami

Updates—News and Reviews:

Selected Recent Stories

December 31, 2015. Inuit Woman Revitalizes Sharing

November 26, 2015. Inuit Throat Singing Helps Heal Social Problems

October 15, 2015. Climate Change Affects the Inuit

September 3, 2015. Walrus Skulls Used as Soccer Balls

All Stories

All stories in this website about the Inuit are listed in the News and Reviews Subject Listing