Peaceful Societies

Alternatives to Violence and War

News and Reviews

Slight Progress on the Stairway to Heaven


The Lepchas are still as committed as they’ve ever been to the completion of their Stairway to Heaven reconstruction project in Daramdin, West Sikkim, and its neighboring Lepcha Heritage Center. According to a news story last week, they have been protesting once again the delays in the project—due to corruption they charge.

A Lepcha man

A Lepcha man (Photo by Ernst Schäfer in Wikimedia, Creative Commons license)

The Stairway to Heaven is a Lepcha myth about a tall tower that their ancestors tried to build out of ceramic blocks in order to reach the sky. However, the story goes, when the people working at the top got the idea of using a hook to pull down the sky to them, tragedy ensued. They passed their request for a hook down the line of workers to the crews on the ground but the message got corrupted on the way down—they appeared to be requesting the destruction of the base of the tower. When the workers at the base obeyed what they thought was the request, the entire tower collapsed. The survivors fled into many places speaking different languages, much like the Tower of Babel story in Genesis.

Over the years, pieces of ceramic blocks have been found in the Daramdin area so tourism promoters conceived the idea of reconstructing a tower in the community with an adjoining Lepcha cultural center. Attract tourism money to West Sikkim. The project was proposed by the Sikkim state government in 1995 but got nowhere. Money for the construction was a problem. The project was revived in 2010, failed, and revived once more in 2014. Officials indicated in 2017 that the construction was underway, but the news story last week repeated the refrain, that the project has stalled once again. After 23 years, the Lepchas are still awaiting their cultural center and symbolic tower.

A Lepcha woman

A Lepcha woman (Photo by the International Institute for Environment and Development on Flickr, Creative Commons license)

The Sikkim Indigenous Tribal Association (SITA) filed a Right to Information application, as allowed by Indian law, and learned, from the state government’s reply, that the contractor that had been working on the project had filed a bill for rs. 4,350,000 and for an advance of rs. 22,000,000 but the construction is still not complete. The project has been re-assigned to another contractor.

The President of SITA, Mangalmit Lepcha, attributed the fiasco to corruption, considering it has  been delayed for over 22 years. He said bitterly, “this has hurt our sentiments and of all the Lepchas at large. We feel humiliated.” Members of the association are asking their representatives in the state legislature for their support.


Semai May Have Achieved their Goals


Peaceful Semai protests about a dam construction project that has caused destruction in their communities appear to be helping their cause. The Orang Asli people living along the Geruntum River in the town of Gopeng, in Malaysia’s Perak State, received a lot of news coverage when the contractors destroyed their crops plus some of their graves and polluted their drinking water. They started getting media attention in mid-February when hundreds of them gathered at the dam site to launch their protests. Then they took the state and national governments to court in early May. Two more Malaysian news reports last week have provided up-to-date information.

A Semai man in Kampung Asli Rening, in the Cameron Highlands

A Semai man in Kampung Asli Rening, in the Cameron Highlands of Malaysia (Photo by tian yake on Flickr, Creative Commons license)

A report published on June 6 indicated that the Semai in the affected communities are heartened by the change of government, from the Barisan Nasional party, which had ruled for 60 years, to the new government of the Pakatan Harapan. The BN was overwhelmed by the PH in national elections held on May 9. A resident of one of the kampungs affected by the dam told the reporter last week that they will continue protesting until the dam project is shelved, and that “now our fate is in the hands of the Pakatan Harapan government.”

The President of the environmental NGO Pertubuhan Pelindung Khazanah Alam Malaysia (Peka), Sajeeda Muhammad, expressed strong support for the Semai position, arguing that the previous government did not properly review development projects such as the controversial dam. Sajeeda conveyed the hope that the new state government would not hide its plans from the villagers—and that it would allow the Semai to keep their traditional lands.

Some Semai houses in Kampung Asli Rening

Some Semai houses in Kampung Asli Rening (Photo by tian yake on Flickr, Creative Commons license)

Sandrea Ng, a legislator, urged the state government to start reviewing development projects with Orang Asli communities when they would be affected. The PH had promised in its election campaigning to respect the customary lands, cemeteries, and properties used for food production by the Orang Asli. “This project has attracted protests from the Orang Asli and environmental concerns, so it should be reviewed to make sure no party is exploited,” she told the reporter.

She added that a meeting had been scheduled for the next day with representatives of the government, the Semai villagers, environmental groups, and the corporate contractors. She told the reporter she hoped the meeting would provide some solutions.

The center of Ipoh

The center of Ipoh (Photo by Adiyon84 on Wikimedia, Creative Commons license)

It did. A news report the next day, June 7, said that the government announced it was backing down—the dam construction was being put on hold until further studies could be completed. After a meeting in Ipoh, the state capital, with many of the stakeholders in the drama of the Semai versus the dam builders present, the chair of the meeting held a press conference to announce the government’s decisions. Mr. A. Sivanesan, an official in the state government, told the press that he had instructed personnel in the Department of Environment to submit reports to him by the end of the month about the project proposal. After that, another meeting will be scheduled to decide the fate of the hydroelectric power dam. He emphasized that the state wishes to be fair to all the involved parties.

During the meeting that day, it became clear that some of the guidelines of the Department of Environment had not been properly followed. Representatives of the Drainage and Irrigation Department admitted that the contractor had polluted the river during the earlier construction period because they did not properly follow the erosion and sedimentation control plan. Mr. Sivanesan chastised the government agencies for not monitoring the project more closely, which could have reduced the negative impacts of the construction.

However, he went on to justify one more time the merits of the proposed dam in terms that would be familiar to many American readers. “The project actually benefits the Orang Asli as they will be given jobs on site,” he said. He urged the members of the press attending the briefing to not forget that the proposal has its merits.

The High Court of Perak in Ipoh

The High Court of Perak in Ipoh (Photo by Miss Prema Darshini in Wikimedia, Creative Commons license)

Sivanesan mentioned the suit currently pending in the Perak High Court. He indicated that lawyers from both sides will be telling the court that they are trying to reach an amicable settlement of the matter. He added that the contractor has agreed to compensate the villagers for the destruction they have caused, though no amounts have been mentioned yet. An MP from Gopeng who also attended the meeting indicated that the new PH government in the state would continue taking financial responsibility for the decisions made during the previous BN government.

Sivanesan concluded that, while the Semai clearly want the project to be cancelled, the state must examine the financial ramifications and reach its own decision. In the event the decision is to go ahead with the dam, the villagers hope that at least the project will be more carefully monitored in order to reduce the impact of the work.



Older News and Reviews

News and reviews of publications relating to peaceful societies—and sometimes to related topics—are normally posted here on Thursday mornings (U.S. time). Older news and reviews for the year are listed on the 2016 page, and ones from previous years are listed on the News and Reviews 2004 page, the 2005 page, the 2006 page, the 2007 page, the 2008 page, the 2009 page, the 2010 page, the 2011 page, the 2012 page, the 2013 page, the 2014 page and the 2015 page. All stories are also included in the News and Reviews Subject Listing. They are listed at the bottom of each society entry in the Encyclopedia of Selected Peaceful Societies, after the heading: Updates: News and Reviews. News and reviews about peacefulness in general are referred to from the bottom of the Facts page, while news stories about this website are linked from the About This Website page. News and Reviews can also be found with the search bar.